Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
@PATH: 218/530 700 840 221/6 1
What is weird about it?
If I'm reading it right, it went from the sender at 218/530, to me, the
uplink at /700, then to 218/840, another one of my downlinks, then
onwards?
Now that I think of it, if 840 had their own uplink, it could have gone
out that way.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin:
http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)